• Kayıt
Merhaba sayın ziyaretçimiz; sayfamıza hoşgeldiniz. Sayfamıza üyelik gerekmeksizin soruları görüntüleyebilirsiniz ve yine soru sormak, cevap yazmak, yorum yapmak ve oylamaya katılmak için ise hızlı ve çok kolay ve ücretsiz bir şekilde üyelik işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirebilirsiniz. Sizi de paylaşım kervanımızda aramızda görmek için sabırsızlanıyoruz.

İlgili sorular

0 oy
0 cevap 14 kez görüntülendi
14 kez görüntülendi 5, Ocak, 2022 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde bbg4555e (120 puan) tarafından soruldu
0 oy
0 cevap 21 kez görüntülendi
21 kez görüntülendi 23, Ağustos, 2021 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde sijf155ss (340 puan) tarafından soruldu
0 oy
0 cevap 11 kez görüntülendi
11 kez görüntülendi 23, Nisan, 2022 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde netcec001 (89,520 puan) tarafından soruldu
0 oy
0 cevap 20 kez görüntülendi
20 kez görüntülendi 16, Şubat, 2022 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde oopp5633l (120 puan) tarafından soruldu
0 oy
0 cevap 17 kez görüntülendi
17 kez görüntülendi 23, Ağustos, 2021 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde sijf155ss (340 puan) tarafından soruldu

En popüler etiketler

8,391 soru

122 cevap

4 yorum

2,849,569 kullanıcı

Hoş geldiniz, Netyuvam S&C sizelere sorularınızın diğer kullanıcılarımız tarafından cevaplanması için bir ortam sağlar.

Numerical Study of Aeroacoustic Sound on Performance of Bladeless Fan

0 oy
16 kez görüntülendi

Aeroacoustic performance of fans is essential due to their widespread application. Therefore, the original aim of this paper is to evaluate the generated noise owing to different geometric parameters. In current study, effect of five geometric parameters was investigated on well performance of a Bladeless fan. Airflow through this fan was analyzed simulating a Bladeless fan within a 2 m×2 m×4 m room. Analysis of the flow field inside the fan and evaluating its performance were obtained by solving conservations of mass and momentum equations for aerodynamic investigations and FW-H noise equations for aeroacoustic analysis. In order to design table bladeless fan Eppler 473 airfoil profile was used as the cross section of this fan. Five distinct parameters, namely height of cross section of the fan, outlet angle of the flow relative to the fan axis, thickness of airflow outlet slit, hydraulic diameter and aspect ratio for circular and quadratic cross sections were considered. Validating acoustic code results, we compared numerical solution of FW-H noise equations for NACA0012 with experimental results. FW-H model was selected to predict the noise generated by the Bladeless fan as the numerical results indicated a good agreement with experimental ones for NACA0012. To validate 3-D numerical results, the experimental results of a round jet showed good agreement with those simulation data. In order to indicate the effect of each mentioned parameter on the fan performance, SPL and OASPL diagrams were illustrated.

There are two typical fans widely used: axial and radial types, however Bladeless fans are completely distinct from those fans in mechanism aspect. Bladeless fan is similar to centrifugal fans in terms of radial impellers for intake air and also it is similar to axial fans in terms of preparing higher rate of outlet airflow. Although studies about wall and table bladeless fan are rare in the literature, numerous experimental and numerical studies have been performed on the axial and centrifugal fans. Lin, et al [2], designed a Forward–Curved (FC) centrifugal fan by numerical simulation and experimental tests. They selected NACA 0012 airfoil profile for its blade and indicated that this fan produces a higher maximum flow rate and static efficiency when the blade inlet angle is 16.5º. The influence of enlarged impeller on performance of a centrifugal fan was experimentally examined by Chunxi, et al [3]. By comparison of obtained results, they observed that flow rate, total pressure rise, shaft power and sound pressure level increased while the efficiency of fan decreased for larger blades. Govardhan, et al [4], investigated the flow field in a cross flow fan by three-dimensional simulation via the commercial software code, CFX. They simulated three impeller geometries for different radius ratio and blade angles, and then they compared their efficiency with each other. Sarraf, et al [5], experimentally studied axial fans performance for two identical fans but with different impeller thickness. They indicated that the overall performance of these two fans is same, but the fan with thicker blades contained higher rate of pressure loss by the means of 8%. Also the efficiency of the fan with thinner blades was 3% higher than the fan with thicker blade. Mohaideen [6] improved an axial fan blade by using the finite element method (FEM) and reduced 18.5% of the blade weight after optimizing on the blade thickness via stress analysis by ANSYS commercial software.

 

20, Ağustos, 2021 Bilgisayar Ağları kategorisinde kow65d (280 puan) tarafından soruldu

Bu soruya cevap vermek için lütfen giriş yapınız veya kayıt olunuz.

...

A Question2Answer database query failed when generating this page.

A full description of the failure is available in the web server's error log file.